Effect of healthcare worker vs. non-health worker delivered health education on modern contraceptive uptake among women in Malawi: a quasi-experimental study

dc.contributor.authorSalamba, Thom
dc.contributor.authorIzudi, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorMasegese, Tumaini
dc.contributor.authorMwila, Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorGueye, Ibrahima
dc.contributor.authorKyule, Grace
dc.contributor.authorKhakayi, Sadie
dc.contributor.authorKaran, Annaline
dc.contributor.authorVellemu, Ruth
dc.contributor.authorMwanga, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorGerbaba, Mulusew J.
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-11T17:03:34Z
dc.date.available2025-11-11T17:03:34Z
dc.date.issued2025-10-29
dc.description.abstractBackground Most women receive health education from healthcare workers. However, the same information can be delivered by non-health workers such as religious and traditional leaders, and peers, among others. The effectiveness of non-health worker-delivered health education on the uptake of hormonal contraceptives, however, remains uncertain. We compared the effectiveness of health worker and non-health worker-delivered health education on the uptake of modern contraceptives among women of reproductive age in two large districts in Malawi. Methods We designed a quasi-experimental study in two Malawian districts (Mangochi and Chikwawa). The intervention was health education delivered by either a health worker, such as a nurse (intervention group), while the comparator was health education delivered by a non-health worker, like a religious or traditional leader, peer, or the media, among others (comparison group). The main outcome was the uptake of modern contraceptives. To remove systematic differences between the two groups and achieve comparability on observed covariates, we used inverse probability of treatment weighting to emulate a randomized trial. After achieving covariate comparability, we performed a binary logistic regression to estimate the effect of health worker-delivered health education on contraceptive uptake, adjusting for the inverse probability of treatment weights. We reported the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results We studied 414 participants aged 15–49 years (median age 29 years, interquartile range 23–36). There were 316 participants in the intervention group, and 143 (45.3%) of them used modern contraceptives. The comparison group had 98 participants, and 41 (41.8%) of them used modern contraceptives (p = 0.552). Participants in the intervention group tended to have an increased modern contraceptive uptake compared to those in the comparison group, although the difference was statistically insignificant (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.74–2.89). Conclusions Modern contraceptive uptake did not differ between health worker and non-health worker-delivered health education approaches in the two Malawian districts. Non-health worker-delivered health education could be an additional tool for reaching several women of reproductive age with modern contraceptive information. This would contribute to increasing the contraceptive prevalence rate and reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality in these districts and similar settings.
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963
dc.identifier.urihttps://dir.muni.ac.ug/handle/20.500.12260/799
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.subjectCommunity health workers
dc.subjectHealth education
dc.subjectModern contraceptive uptake
dc.subjectPropensity-score weighting
dc.subjectQuasi-experimental
dc.titleEffect of healthcare worker vs. non-health worker delivered health education on modern contraceptive uptake among women in Malawi: a quasi-experimental study
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Izudi_Article_2025_29102025.pdf
Size:
1.01 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.17 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: